Chris Brogden wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> As much as I prefer film, I don't quite agree with this. I've seen prints
> made from the better digitals and enlarged to 16x20, and they look no
> worse than 16x20's taken with a lot of 35mm film.
I found that the real difference is 16x20s from 35mm on a tripod vs.
16x20s from digital on a tripod: the digital doesn't gain that fine
detail back. The digital prints look sharp, but don't have the fine
detail in the textures...and no one is gonna notice unless they're
lookin' for it. Oh, and no one is gonna notice unless the 35mm 16x20
was made with a fabulously sharp printing lens.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
