I don't think the laws in regard to the depiction of nude children have anything to do with the kind of moral judgement you describe. They're the result of widespread sexual assaults on children. The sexual predators who perform these heinious crimes always seem to have a large collection of child pornography. The laws banning such material provide at least some means of getting the creeps off the street. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi Tom, > > no - I'm not implying that, and I apologise if my posts read that way. > But I do think that a lot of people are being cowed by the censorious > and over-cautious. > > The overwhelming majority of people everywhere love watching children > play and enjoy themselves, with or without clothes on, in the most > innocent way, and think nothing of it. However there is a small but > vocal group of people who are always ready to see wickedness and rush > in to cover things up. These are the people who equate nakedness with > sexuality, and who also think all sexuality is wrong. Unless the rest > of us stand up to them and say no to their stupidity they will win, > and they will impose their warped ideas on us again and again because > we let them. Just think of the Victorians covering up table legs. > > -- > Cheers, > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Tom C > > Sent: 20 July 2006 20:49 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: PESO - Jump > > > > I've noticed that your words and others, seem to imply that > > those who had a > > problem with the photo being posted without a warning (not > > necessarialy the > > photo itself), have a perverse or distorted view of the subject. > > > > That was not the case. > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
