Well stated Aaron.
Tom C.
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:30:00 -0400
DagT, ridiculing the laws of another country, even when they deserve to be
ridiculed, does not make them less applicable to inhabitants of those
countries.
Our child pornography laws over-reach and have terrible consequences for
innocent people who run afoul of them. I think they are poorly thought out
and badly implemented. Despite my disagreement with them, I am not immune
from prosecution.
A large portion of this list are from North America and are subject to the
same idiotic laws. In deference to these people, can you please post a
content warning with your links?
Recently, a man spent several months in jail on child pornography charges.
He was turned in by a photofinisher (who is obligated under the law to
report anything vaguely resembling child porn ) for a photograph of him
kissing his infant's belly. He was held without bail because a seizure and
search of his computer turned up photos of a relative's children frolicking
in a sprinkler in the backyard -- not even saved pictures, but cached ones,
because the relative had made an online gallery and sent him the link.
Of course, when it went to trial the case was thrown out, but the man lost
months of his life.
Yes, I live in a country with stupid laws. But I would be more stupid to
ignore them and put myself at risk. I am no martyr and I don't want to
miss out on any part of my son's life because I wasn't careful.
-Aaron
-----Original Message-----
From: DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: PESO - Jump
Date: Fri Jul 21, 2006 12:55 pm
Size: 1K
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
Den 21. jul. 2006 kl. 15.30 skrev William Robb:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "mike wilson"
> Subject: Re: PESO - Jump
>
>>
>> Why do they need to be naked? Paedophiles sexualise children.
>> End of
>> story. _Any_ child photo is fair game.
>>
>
> May be end of story in your mind, ut you could try reading the rest
> of the
> story.
> Child porn laws sexualize children, and therin lies the problem for
> people
> who innocently click on an internet link.
If you can be prosecuted for finding something by accident on an
internet link you should stay off the internet.
Either that, or you are being more than a little bit paranoid.
Here´s a nice little story:
My wife had a rare family name when I met her. I think there were 28
people in Norway, and probably in the world, with that name. So, you
should think it was safe to make a search on that name on the
internet. The third hit on Altavista was, however, to a pornographic
web site featuring schoolgirls. So, if that happened at an office in
the US or in Canada I could be arrested? Wow!
Oh, and by the way, the explanation was probably simple as one of the
persons with that name is an HTML programmer, and one of the modules
he has made may have been used by the website. Maybe he could have
been arrested as well?
DagT
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
