Interesting change in values here. It used to be naked children were not considered offensive, the boys were actually required to swim in the nude at school. Now it is porn. At one time it was considered indecent for a woman to show her ankle, now they wear very skimpy bikinis in public --and not just at the beach, but it is supposed to be evil to photograph them doing it. The mores of society are strange indeed.
-- graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" ----------------------------------- Tom C wrote: >> In North America, there is not a solid line dividing "non kiddie porn nude >> pics" from kiddie porn. >> >> William Robb > > While I'm not offended by the human body, if I was at a public park and saw > pre-pubescent older children running around naked I would likely leave. > That being said, I don't enjoy looking at this kind of picture either. And > even more, I question the need to show this kind of picture. > > Call me a prude or North American or whatever you want. I question why one > HAS to show pictures of naked children when one could show pictures of them > clothed. > > If Dag posted a naked picture of his wife, might some consider that porn? I > would suggest so. Now, show naked pictures of children. It's just a step > away. > > Tom C. > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
