On 25/7/06, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed: >While I'm not offended by the human body, if I was at a public park and saw >pre-pubescent older children running around naked I would likely leave. >That being said, I don't enjoy looking at this kind of picture either. And >even more, I question the need to show this kind of picture. > >Call me a prude or North American or whatever you want. I question why one >HAS to show pictures of naked children when one could show pictures of them >clothed. > >If Dag posted a naked picture of his wife, might some consider that porn? I >would suggest so. Now, show naked pictures of children. It's just a step >away.
You're a prude ;-) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net