On 25/7/06, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:

>While I'm not offended by the human body, if I was at a public park and saw 
>pre-pubescent older children running around naked I would likely leave.  
>That being said, I don't enjoy looking at this kind of picture either.  And 
>even more, I question the need to show this kind of picture.
>
>Call me a prude or North American or whatever you want.  I question why one 
>HAS to show pictures of naked children when one could show pictures of them 
>clothed.
>
>If Dag posted a naked picture of his wife, might some consider that porn?  I 
>would suggest so.  Now, show naked pictures of children.  It's just a step 
>away.

You're a prude ;-)

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   |     People, Places, Pastiche
||=====|    http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to