Den 25. jul. 2006 kl. 18.01 skrev Tom C:

>>
>> In North America, there is not a solid line dividing "non kiddie  
>> porn nude
>> pics" from kiddie porn.
>>
>> William Robb
>
> While I'm not offended by the human body, if I was at a public park  
> and saw
> pre-pubescent older children running around naked I would likely  
> leave.
> That being said, I don't enjoy looking at this kind of picture  
> either.  And
> even more, I question the need to show this kind of picture.
>
> Call me a prude or North American or whatever you want.  I question  
> why one
> HAS to show pictures of naked children when one could show pictures  
> of them
> clothed.
>
> If Dag posted a naked picture of his wife, might some consider that  
> porn?  I
> would suggest so.  Now, show naked pictures of children.  It's just  
> a step
> away.

It is good that you do not visit Norway these days, Tom.  In the heat  
children are playing naked in the sun.  Innocently and without  
thought about strange thought on the other side of the world.

By the way: I have published nude photos of my wife, and they are  
much less pornographic than Williams pin-up pictures .-)

And why do I publish these photos? Because I like them, I would like  
to hear others opinions  about them as photographs and like any other  
statement it is my right to do so in a free country.  Actually I do  
not need a reason. If the US is limiting its citizens  freedom to  
express themselves it is their problem, not mine. If your strange  
morals is making internet a dangerous place for you it is also your  
problem.

DagT

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to