Dag, Nice photo, but not one for work. I would be uncomfortable looking at this on my work screen.
At work, we live by the morals of the combined organization. In the US, we have had lots of training on being sensitive toward others, so as not to offend them for their beliefs or preferences. So I personally avoid looking at pictures that women could interpret as somehow seeing them as objects rather than individual people. It's not really been a problem except for the guy who went to Thialand and loaded a bunch of porn onto his company laptop. When he insisted on playing it at work, one of the neighboring women complained and he was marched out the door. Regards, Bob S. On 7/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated 7/25/2006 3:15:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > writes: > Sorry it´s the best I can do on such short notice: > http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=65890 > > DagT > ======= > That's nice, Dag. Makes a nice abstract. And it did have a warning. :-) So I > looked. > > The human body is a thing of beauty. > > Marnie aka Doe > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
