When I bought mine it was to use on film cameras but I never did because right after that I purchased an *ist DS. It's light, has good bokeh and like others said images come out sharp. On a digital camera you lose the wide end so not really good for scenic shots but good enough for a walkabout lens. But now that I have the 16-45mm coming I don't know if I will use this as much.
Francis samples (office friendly): http://www.pbase.com/freckles/image/61914548 http://www.pbase.com/freckles/image/61914566 On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Aaron Reynolds wrote: ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 0:22:00 -0400 From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: FA 28-70 f4 AL To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" So I hear that a lot of people like this lens, other than its tendency to split apart. I've never been one for zooms, and so I never considered buying it. However, I've come across one. Someone convince me to keep it, or not keep it. I'm unlikely to ever use it on film (because it won't fit on my 67). I have an SMC-M 28mm f2.8, a Super Takumar 35mm f2.0 and an SMC-F 50mm f1.4 in the range this fellow covers. Tell me why I'd want to keep it. -Aaron ------------------------------ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
