CNN clip at http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/07/21/Sept.11.prof.ap/index.html
Essentially... 1. Most in the Muslim world believe 9/11 was an inside job. 2. After reviewing all the evidence, he concludes that 9/11 was a new Pearl Harbor, an inside job designed by intelligence agencies and most likely commanded and authorized by Cheney. 3. The buildings in New York were brought down by controlled demolitions, running airplanes into them as a cover. 4. According to a university higher-up, the course is supposed to foster critical thinking. Tom C. >From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: Talk about crap >Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:48:00 -0400 > >And what were they? The article is very vague. > >-Aaron > >-----Original Message----- > >From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subj: Re: Talk about crap >Date: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:33 pm >Size: 1K >To: pdml@pdml.net > >I saw him on televison Aaron. The claims came from his own mouth. He was >not teaching the class how to discern truth from falsehood. > >Tom C. > > > > > >From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >Subject: Re: Talk about crap > >Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:55:20 -0400 > > > > > >On Jul 26, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Keith McGuinness wrote: > > > > > I don't feel that my academic freedom would be infringed in the > > > least if he got the boot. > > > >Keith, you wouldn't feel that your academic freedom would be infringed > >if a professor were booted without an examination of the material or > >even a single person knowing what his claims actually are? Just based > >on a single line in a newspaper article describing what we can only > >assume is the most sensational part of his intended lecture, and > >without context? > > > >What if he's presenting it to be debunked by the class as an exercise > >but loses his job on the strength of this newspaper article -- would > >you still feel that your academic freedom had not been infringed then? > > > >What I've been trying to say (and for some reason this got me labeled > >as a 9/11 Denier) is that someone should, you know, find out what he's > >actually saying before the man is condemned for saying it. > > > >-Aaron > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >PDML@pdml.net > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
