sh... I didn´t see that one .-) Den 28. jul. 2006 kl. 23.19 skrev Bob W:
> Amazing. I'm astounded that any Swiss patent clerk could possibly be > good at physics. Who'd have thought such a thing was possible? They'll > have their faces on t-shirts next, I'll bet. > > -- > Cheers, > Bob > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of DagT >> Sent: 28 July 2006 21:34 >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: Talk about crap >> >> Not really, I should know. I am a patent attorney and former patent > >> examiner/clerk in Norway, and a partner here: http:// >> www.protector.biz/uk/ You´ll find my face somewhere on that cite. >> >> ...and just to say somethng about the US patent attorneys: >> They have >> law degrees as well, making them very good at handling conflicts. >> >> DagT >> >> Den 28. jul. 2006 kl. 22.15 skrev Bob W: >> >>> Really? You amaze me. >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Bob >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>>> Behalf Of DagT >>>> Sent: 28 July 2006 20:51 >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> Subject: Re: Talk about crap >>>> >>>> Well, actually the Swiss, and the German, are quite good. Fond or >>>> rules and order. In Germany they often have Ph. D´s while >> in the US >>> >>>> they often have bachelors degrees in their technical field... > .-) >>>> >>>> DagT >>>> >>>> Den 28. jul. 2006 kl. 21.29 skrev Bob W: >>>> >>>>> Perhaps he drew it with brakes and intends to put a big sign on >>> them >>>>> when he's built it saying "Warning - do not apply brakes. > Applying >>>>> brakes invalidates warranty". >>>>> >>>>> That would easily get by the patent clerks, who are >>>> probably not very >>>>> good at physics anyway. Especially the Swiss. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Bob >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>>>>> Behalf Of graywolf >>>>>> Sent: 28 July 2006 16:24 >>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>> Subject: Re: Talk about crap >>>>>> >>>>>> Interesting, since the US patent laws specifically says PM >>>>>> machines are >>>>>> not patentable, and any such are automatically rejected without >>>>>> consideration. Now it is possible some things have been > patented >>>>> that >>>>>> fall into that category, but the fact that they do has, in that >>>>> case, >>>>>> been cleverly concealed by the applicant. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> DagT >> http://dag.foto.no >> >> Beware of internet links. You never know what is on the other side. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net DagT http://dag.foto.no Beware of internet links. You never know what is on the other side. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
