I'm not complaining, just pointing out that it just adds to the feature 
list.  The length of the manual explaining all the features in the 
*ist-Ds sent Ann running back to a Canon ZLR when she rightfully belongs 
in the Pentax fold.   I wonder how many other people are more 
intimidated than enticed by huge numbers of features.

Aaron Reynolds wrote:

>I also will not use  this feature -- but since a simple change to a preference 
>setting will cause the switch to behave as a regular DOF preview, just like on 
>the old bodies, 
>I see no reason to complain about it.
>
>-Aaron
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>From:  "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subj:  Re: K10D - More News
>Date:  Fri Aug 4, 2006 4:07 pm
>Size:  4K
>To:  Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>
>Unfortunately the rear screen DOFP is the same as taking a photograph 
>you can't save.  Not to mention the fact that the resolution on the rear 
>screen isn't really high enough to make a good determination of DOF 
>anyway.  I personally think that it's a useless feature.  I know some 
>will disagree.
>
>Tom C wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I like the on-screen DOFP.  Often hard to get a good feeling in low light 
>>through the viewfinder.
>>
>>Tom C.
>>
>>"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or 
>>numbered."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>Subject: Re: K10D - More News
>>>Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 15:51:53 -0400
>>>
>>>Damn, it looks to me as if Pentax has decided to add as many "features"
>>>to the mix as possible, without asking if these are necessary to the
>>>likely target audience.  More like, what can we implement "cheaply" to
>>>set us apart, and get the bullet point count up.  Oh, well.  At least we
>>>can hope the core operations and build quality will be solid.
>>>
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Well, I've only actually seen photos of the latest build of it, courtesy 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>of my
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Pentax rep, but at least I've got a little more information for you to 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>chew
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>on.  The photos were taken this week, so this is about as current as it 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>gets.
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>First off, the magic press-release date is September 13th.  There's still 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>so
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>much I haven't been able to pry from my rep that I'm dying for this date 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>to
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>hurry up and get here!
>>>>
>>>>Body + 18-55 lens should be $899.  A bit more than I expected, but still 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>a damn
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>good price.
>>>>
>>>>The name is definitely K10D (it was stamped on the body). Any remaining
>>>>doubters can relax now.
>>>>
>>>>Remember in the PMA photos 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>(http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pma2006/Pentax/),
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>that unmarked button that was above the AF switch on the front of the 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>camera?
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>It's now marked RAW, and I'm told it allows you to switch the camera to 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>RAW
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>mode from jpg mode by pressing and holding the RAW button.  I think I 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>would
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>have preferred a custom white balance button, but I'm sure this function 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>will
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>be useful for people who shoot in jpg mode most of the time.
>>>>
>>>>The LCD screen is the same as on the K100D: 2.5 ", 210,000 pixels
>>>>
>>>>The battery grip has the same features as the grip for the *istD, though 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>I
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>can't say whether or not it connects to the body in the same way.
>>>>
>>>>The body is slightly different than the one shown at PMA, though not by 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>much.
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I'd be more specific, but I didn't have much time to really study the new
>>>>images.
>>>>
>>>>The mode dial on the camera's shoulder now has a lot more on it than at 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>PMA.  I
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>couldn't see much detail in the images, but the new stuff looked like the 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>same
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>sort of preset shooting modes you see on consumer cameras (sports, 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>portrait,
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>night scene, etc).
>>>>
>>>>DOF-preview now functions in a very interesting manner (apparently it 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>does this
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>on the K100D, but I didn't know that).  Straight out of the box, when you 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>use
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>the DOF-preview function, it actually takes a photo and displays it on 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>the
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>screen until you press halfway on the shutter button (no, the photo is 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>not
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>saved on your memory card).  If you want the more standard thru-the-lens 
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>DOF-
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>preview, you can change that in a custom function menu.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That's all I can remember.  Have fun!
>>>>
>>>>John Celio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>--
>>>When you're worried or in doubt,
>>>     Run in circles, (scream and shout).
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>[email protected]
>>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>


-- 
When you're worried or in doubt, 
        Run in circles, (scream and shout).


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to