To sell more lenses obviously. 

Aaron Reynolds wrote:

>No, I'm with you too.
>
>If a larger sensor 35mm style camera were coming from Pentax, their new lenses 
>would be rendered useless.  Why would they do that to themselves?
>
>-Aaron
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>From:  "John Celio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subj:  Re: K10D - More News
>Date:  Sat Aug 5, 2006 3:43 am
>Size:  1K
>To:  "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>
>  
>
>>Does it bother anyone else that the K1D may shortly follow? Of course I
>>wouldn't absolutely need it, but for just a few hundred more and with
>>that larger sensor, etc..etc..
>>    
>>
>
>What bothers me is where you got that crazy idea.  There is no such thing as 
>a K1D, and even if there were, it wouldn't have a larger sensor.  Pentax is 
>commited to the APS-C sensors.  If they weren't, they wouldn't be making so 
>many lenses for it.
>
>If you want a larger sensor, get the 645D.  As far as Pentax goes, I have no 
>doubt that's going to be your only option.  There have been no developments 
>to the contrary.  If Pentax comes out with (and actually delivers to 
>consumers) a 35mm-type dSLR in the next couple years that has a sensor 
>larger than what is in their current line, I'll print out and eat this 
>email.
>
>
>Am I the only person being driven nuts by all the incredibly irrational 
>speculation going on around here?
>
>John Celio
>
>--
>
>http://www.neovenator.com
>
>AIM: Neopifex
>
>"Hey, I'm an artist.  I can do whatever I want and pretend I'm making a 
>statement." 
>
>
>
>  
>


-- 
When you're worried or in doubt, 
        Run in circles, (scream and shout).


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to