There are a few small problems with the mechanics of the *ist-D but
comparing it to the Ds, in my opinion it is. On the other hand I grab
the DS more often than the D these days. The buffer is just enough
faster to tip the balance as to which I would have with me.
keith_w wrote:
>Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>
>>William Robb wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>My concern is that I know that well built, good quality equipment costs
>>>extra to produce. A build and finish like the istD is not cheap to
>>>produce. A build and finish like what has come after isn't up to my
>>>standard.
>>>
>>>
>>Bravo. Exactly right.
>>They proved with the ist-D that people will pay around $1500 if the
>>quality is there.
>>
>>
>
>For one who has not yet made a jump to the *ist side, are you telling me that
>when all the follow-up family members of the *istD's are considered, the *istD
>is still top of the line in build and finish?
>
>Thanks, keith
>
>
>
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
