Let me jump in to add that 35mm neg scans on my Epson Perfection 3170 PHOTO flatbed are doubtless crappier than yours.
Jack --- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just wanted to add to this "on a scanner with poor dynamic range." > > Like I said before, my neg results are superior for ISO 400 and above > using a Polaroid Sprintscan 120. Neg results are total crap from my > Epson 3200 flatbed. > > If you have a good scanner and standardize your process, i.e. get > your film processed at the same lab, preferably a consistent one, and > use the same film or group of films (the Fuji N series are nice and > consistent) the majority of your work only needs to be done once. > > -Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Mat Maessen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subj: Re: Neg v Slide Scanning Results > Date: Tue Aug 8, 2006 7:55 pm > Size: 1K > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > > So to get the full dynamic range out of the > image, the scanner is working in a relatively small range of light > levels coming through the film. That's why it looks grainer. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
