Well, I can't (and won't) do any timed tests, but the K100D is much better at low light AF than the last gen of Pentax DSLRs. I have an *ist DS and it has trouble locking onto subjects when it's dark, and when it does lock-on, it's slow; the K100D on the other hand, locks on very quickly even in low-light situations. Another thing is that the AF motor seems to have been replaced with a much faster one, higher pitched whine but it's fast, faster with NiMH batteries than the DS is with CRV-3s. I haven't done any tests or trials, but I use both cameras day-in-day-out and the difference is very noticeable.
hope this helps, -Asad Shel Belinkoff wrote: >How so? Please be as specific as you can. Thanks. > >Shel > > > > > >>[Original Message] >>From: Asad Masede >> >> > > > > >>I think the K110D is much better than the DL on many counts. First, if >>the AF is anything like the K100D (which I own), it's *MUCH* better than >>what you get on the DL; >> >> > > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
