William Robb wrote: > I took the big gun down to Don's Photo yesterday to try out the K100D. > It's a nice little camera, though not up to the finish if the istD. > > I was primarily interested in seeing if the antishake worked, so I did a > couple of shots for comparative purposes. > Both pictures were shot with the A600/5.6 handheld. I wasn't making a > really scientific thing out of it, so I left the camera on program, and > let it do it's thing. I suspect the shutter speed was close to 1/500, > but the EXIF data is missing this information for some reason. > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/antishake/ > > Anyway, these are straight from the camera, the jpegs were shot at > 1600x2400 pixels and the compression was set to medium. I forgot to take > a card with me, so they loaned me a small capacity card to use for this. > Cosequently, I didn't get to really work the technology. > Perhaps on Monday I'll try again. > This page is not dial up friendly, there are two images of 1mb each > > William Robb > > >
Thank you for the test. I have been mostly monitoring the forum for quite a while & anxiously waiting for the K10. I hope it gets here in time for the migratory bird season. I have 3 questions about the technology. How good does the anti shake work during panning? Does it work properly when the system is tripod mounted? The Pentax descriptive pdf file says it works at focal lengths up to 800 mm, what happens when you put a 2X converter onto the 600? -- David S. Nature and wildlife photography http://www.sheppardphotos.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
