David, Do I understand you to be speculating as to the relative resolution achievable by use of a, yet to be released, 10mp D and 67 "film"? Assuming you have a 67 available to you, have you made such a comparison?
Jack --- David Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To change from 67 would imply improved resolution and detail ... If > shooting tripod mounted and with the mirror locked up it might be > possible to use the SR system move the sensor a small amount between > exposures then combine exposures using an interpolation algorithm to > improve the resolution? Similarly, combining multiple exposures to > improve the dynamic range in camera (a bit like HDR imaging). > > Dave > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, 14 August, 2006 12:08:00 PM > Subject: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body > > > No... mostly I shoot colour neg and make really nice scans on my > Sprintscan 120. > > -Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Lucas Rijnders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subj: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body > Date: Mon Aug 14, 2006 5:12 am > Size: 1K > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 03:01:20 +0200, Aaron Reynolds > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have just learned something about it that pretty much seals the > deal > > -- I'll be buying it if I have to sell a kidney to do it. It > addresses > > my most basic complaint about digital. It's a feature that's so > much > > of a no-brainer, and yet as far as I know not a single DSLR out > there > > at any price, including ones using the same sensor, have it. > > > > And unless I've missed some posts, no one has even speculated about > it > > here. Or even said "gee, I wish it could do this". > > > > Brothers, I kid you not -- I may be selling my 67. Naturally, I > have > > to see it in action to see if it matches up to what the advantage > > should be in theory. But if it does... holy crap. > > > > Mid-September we're going to be seeing some forehead-slapping > amongst > > the competition in the DSLR world. > > > > Unless, of course, I've been fed a complete load of manure. Which > is > > entirely possible. > > Hi Aaron, > > Brilliant post :o) My first guess was ISO as accessible as shutter > and > aperture as an exposure control. However, you heavily hint at vastly > improved image quality, archieveable with the same sensor. So I'll > just > ask: > > Do you shoot a lot of B&W in the 67? > > -- > Regards, Lucas > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
