How about true 16 bit output ? On 8/17/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jens, > > If it was merely resolution, why the heck would Aaron be looking at the > K10D instead of a higher-resolution body from Nikon or Canon (Or a > Hasselblad or other MF body with a digiback). > > Aaron specifically said it was something _no_ other DSLR offered yet. > And between the D2x, 5D, 1Ds mkII and Mamiya ZD, there are plenty of > options which handily outperform the upcoming K10D for resolution. And > there are 3 other cameras on the market (or will be before the K10D) > which match the K10D for resolution (A100, D80 and Digital Module R). > > And also its something he can't talk about, the resolution of the K10D > was practically the first thing we knew about it. > > -Adam > > > > Jens Bladt wrote: > > Come on folks - it's not that hard. What makes the 67 superior to almost ANY > > digital camera - except for resolution? > > The K10D closes this gap. > > And - yes - I believe I did guess Aarons secret. > > Jens > > > > Jens Bladt > > http://www.jensbladt.dk > > +45 56 63 77 11 > > +45 23 43 85 77 > > Skype: jensbladt248 > > > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af John > > Francis > > Sendt: 17. august 2006 18:15 > > Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Emne: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:31:35PM +0100, Richard Day wrote: > > > >>Raw rules! > >> > >>But in addition to PEF (if they insist on keeping it), please implement > >>compressed DNG properly with full sized embedded JPEG "in-camera" as an > >>option. > > > > > > PEF, of course, already includes a full sized embedded JPEG "in-camera". > > Unfortunately it's done at the lowest JPEG quality, so it's not useful > > for much more than the preview (in-camera on the LCD, and also in the > > Pentax Photo Browser) for which it was presumably included. > > > > I've long wanted control over the quality of that JPEG - if I'm shooting > > raw I'm not going to complain about the difference between a 3MB JPEG > > that's quite usable for many purposes and a 1.5MB JPEG of no use to me. > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.1/421 - Release Date: 08/16/2006 > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.1/421 - Release Date: 08/16/2006 > > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- Regards Patrick Genovese -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
