I read something one time about the way different papers react to droplet size. The finish either repels or absorbs the inks differently. So, smaller droplets would spread reducing detail in some papers.
-Brendan --- Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've always been curious as to whether there were a > direct connection > between droplet size and printer resolution. AEBE, > it seems smaller ink > droplets would equal finer printed detail.(?) > What are the paper considerations? > > Jack > > --- Brendan MacRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hum, not sure that smaller droplets always > translate > > to print detail. The paper is a big variable here. > > However, that's interesting, too. The 2400 has a > huge > > following, I know, but it's too small for what I > want > > to do. > > > > -Brendan > > > > --- Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > In keeping with my severe resolution hang-up, > I've > > > noted that the R1800 > > > advertises having the smallest ink droplets in > the > > > industry, 1.5 > > > picoliters. The R2400, 3.5 picoliters, but > produces > > > "superior" B&W > > > prints. > > > This is my total offering on the subject. > > > > > > Jack > > > > > > --- Brendan MacRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I'm going to be putting my digital darkroom > > > together > > > > soon and I've decided on everything but the > > > printer at > > > > this point. > > > > > > > > I want a large format ink jet and have been > > > looking at > > > > Canon and Epson. Both of the 17" wide $1800 > > > printers > > > > have gotten good reviews. I'm leaning toward > the > > > Epson > > > > since I know a designer who owns an older > model > > > that > > > > produces amazing prints. I've never seen > anything > > > from > > > > a Canon. > > > > > > > > Also, does anyone else use the ColorVision > Print > > > Fix > > > > Pro suite? +'s? -'s? > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > -Brendan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > > protection around > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > -- > > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > > protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > -- > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > [email protected] > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
