I suspect that optical anti-shake is not really that expensive to manufacture. They probably just have a very high profit margin on them. You can probably expect the price to come down instead. It will be interesting to find out which is the better system, that probably will not be the market winner in the long run.
-- graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" ----------------------------------- Tom C wrote: > Only to be regained by the ability to sell more camera bodies and lower cost > high quailty lenses w/o the expensive AS built in. > > > > Tom C. > > "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or > numbered." > > > > From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: any views on K100D vs. Canon Rebel XT (350D)? > Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:20:21 -0400 > > > On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Tom C wrote: > > > I would expect Canon to implement in-body anti-shake at the soonest > > possible > > time. No information to that, just common sense. > > Won't that destroy the market for their pricey lenses with anti-shake > in them? > > -Aaron > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
