Digital Image Studio wrote: > On 24/08/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>The Canon's. >> >>The issue becomes what old lenses do you use. Put a Zeiss Distagon >>21/2.8 or Leitz R 19/2.8 on a 5D and you will be very pleasantly >>surprised. From 24mm on up, the Canon L's are superb perfomers on FF, as >>is the better Nikon glass (via an adaptor). The Nikon 17-35 f2.8 does >>very well on full-frame as well. >> >>One of the major problems with FF is that pixel-peeping has become so >>easy, before most people did ther tests with their working emulsions >>rather than Tech Pan and those working emulsions couldn't outresolve >>decent glass. > > > Well said. There seems to be little complaint emanating from the > owners of the said full frame cameras. >
I know some who complain, I know others who don't. When I ask pointed questions, the ones who do use Canon ultra-wides or cheap glass. When I see the shots from the L ultra-wides, they aren't as bad as made out. The others i generally ignore (No s**t your 5D looks like crap with a 28-90 f3.5-5.6 on the front, shouldn't have bought a $100 zoom for a $3000 camera) -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
