I only used the 18-55 for a few hours, and wasn't as familiar with the
camera at that time, so a real comparison wasn't/couldn't be made. 
However, based on the results and from what I remember of them, I'd say the
16-45 was superior in just about every way, however, I think the 18-55 is
better than many regard it to be.  A very good-great kit lens, a fine
travel if the result you're after are smaller-sized prints (8x10 or so), 
good for portraits, family snaps.  I like the way it handles a little
better than the 16-45.  Quite worth the money, IMO, especially when bought
as part of the kit.  The extra reach at the long end may be useful for some
situations.  If I were to buy one or the other separately, I'd buy the
16-45.

Shel



> [Original Message]
> From: Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> What about 16-45 vs cheap 18-55? Is the upgrade even worth it?
>
> 2006/8/24, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> > I used it every day for almost a month. It's OK, but, IMO, over rated,
> > especially when used for detail work.  Not at all bad for portraits,
some
> > landscapes, travel ... but not up to critical standards or for fine
> > details.  What other way is there to evaluate a lens than by using it,
> > i.e., an in use test?  I used it hand held and on a tripod, I used it
wide
> > open and stopped down, I used it for close focusing and for distant
objects.
> >
> > Shel
> >
> >
> >
> > > [Original Message]
> > > From: Paul Stenquist
> >
> > > I tend to think you might be pleased with the 16-45 as well in a
> > > longer term test. In use evaluation is invaluable but not always
> > > accurate.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
>
>
> -- 
> ----------------------
> Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
> ----------------------
> *ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to