Did you miss the smiley? John
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:46:43 +0100, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 31/8/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> >> Your suggestion that the new camera will only work with USM lenses is, >> of >> course, a pathetic attempt by a Canon mole to spread FUD. :-) > > Not at all dear boy. Just a plain fact. > > The only reason I sold most of my Pentax manual focus film gear and > purchased Canon digital, was because I was probably too impatient, and > did not want to wait yet another year or 2 for the Pentax offering. For > me, buying and selling lenses is just part and parcel of the game. Most > come and go, some are gems and stay the distance, even making the > transition across brands, why not? > > When I decided to switch, there was a lot of 'oooh, think of all that > money you're going to have to shell out for new lenses, what a waste, > what a shame, what a'......load a bollocks! > > There's only one thing I'm really interested in and that's the picture. > Everything else is a supporting role, equipment included. If that means > I sell all my Canon gear and buy a coupld of K10Ds and some lenses, > that's fine. Not a problem. Unlikely, but not a problem. If a K1D made > an appearance, I might be sorely tempted. For now, Canon does the job. I > have no reason to diss Pentax. > > I am genuinely interested as to what the new technology Pentax will be > offering in the K10D. If that means backward incompatibility, then I > want to know, as I'm sure do others. > > I am not a Canon mole, only a photographic mole. > > > !! > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
