I've looked on the magazine website www.photographymonthly.com where
there is a discussion group. In fairness to Nikon (will that phrase
get me barred from PDML?) it was their old 200mm lens not the latest
VR xyz etc. Doesn't stop them charging £1000+ for it tho'!

Peter

On 9/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a message dated 9/2/2006 5:59:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > The top lens was the Sigma 100mm with 88/100 which
> > ranked far above
> > the 150 and 180 offerings from this company. In
> > second place was the
> > Tamron 90mm, marginally ahead of the Pentax.
> > (86/100)
> >
> > One hopes the magazine does not fold as a result of
> > poor advertising revenue!!
> >
> > Peter
> ========
> I have the Tamron 90mm, several on this list do, and it is very, very nice.
>
> Marnie aka Doe
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to