Peter, are you syaing that good "test" results are often or genrally paid for, by the avertisers? Regards Jens
Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248 -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Peter Fairweather Sendt: 3. september 2006 19:28 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: Re: Uk review of macro lenses I've looked on the magazine website www.photographymonthly.com where there is a discussion group. In fairness to Nikon (will that phrase get me barred from PDML?) it was their old 200mm lens not the latest VR xyz etc. Doesn't stop them charging £1000+ for it tho'! Peter On 9/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated 9/2/2006 5:59:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > The top lens was the Sigma 100mm with 88/100 which > > ranked far above > > the 150 and 180 offerings from this company. In > > second place was the > > Tamron 90mm, marginally ahead of the Pentax. > > (86/100) > > > > One hopes the magazine does not fold as a result of > > poor advertising revenue!! > > > > Peter > ======== > I have the Tamron 90mm, several on this list do, and it is very, very nice. > > Marnie aka Doe > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/436 - Release Date: 09/01/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/436 - Release Date: 09/01/2006 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
