Eliminating the lower third would place the composition in an oft preferred one wherein the horizon is out of the center. Obviously not a compelling rule, but one that I've followed from time to time if the resulting composition felt better as a result. I think I like the tree/building placement as is.
Jack --- Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a question about composition. I came across the following > photo > (not mine): > > http://www.zyeuter.com/bon_baiser_de_valensole/photo107872.html > > There is much about it that I like, but I think that the bottom third > is > a mistake. It seems to me that the photographer should have cut off > the > bottom third, then extended the composition somewhat to the right (if > > possible--maybe there's a cement plant there), placing the building > at > the upper-left "golden rectangle" point. > > What do others think? Is there justification for keeping the lower > third? > > Joe > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
