Maybe if Pentax released enough details about the camera - to the public - before it goes on sale to the public, they would generate demand. Why should it be a hush hush secret? That would be a ridiculous approach. What would be lost? It's not some stealth corporate hi-tech espionage affair.
How can you, a private individual and customer, "get in trouble" from a corporation that holds no authority over you? If Pentax Japan did not want anybody to know then they should not have told anybody. What is gained by telling dealers who are forbidden to tell the customer? The whole thing is preposterous. Tom C. >From: John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: K10D Competitors and Press Release >Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:05:35 -0700 > > > As for the supposed press release, if it is real will > > someone just post the whole thing already? It makes no > > sense to post just bits and pieces. If you are really > > leaking confidential information, just go the whole > > way and leak ALL of it :-)... > >Remember when I posted a bunch of new info about the camera that I got from >my >Pentax rep? Well, Pentax's engineers in Japan found my e-mail through >Google >and I got in trouble for it (I hadn't been told about the non-disclosure >agreement my store signed, so I got off easy). > >I wish I could tell everything I know about the camera, but I don't want to >get >in trouble again, and I'm sure that's how other people with privileged >knowledge feel about the situation. It's already frustrating enough; >please >don't make it worse by begging. > >The official press release will happen soon enough. Just be patient and >you'll >hear it all straight from the horse's mouth. > >John Celio > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
