[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sep 10, 2006, at 11:27 AM, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote: > > >>A consideration: >>We must remember that these DSLRs are now just computers and >>the longer we hang onto older technology the faster it loses value. >>The faster upgrade may be the cheaper way to go. > > > What was your motivation in posting this? > > My Canon 10D, slowpoke 6Mpixel lump that it is, continues to take the > same superb photographs it took in 2003 when I bought it. It's built > like a tank, is about as big and heavy as one, and with the top notch > lenses works a treat. Who cares that it's not "worth" much any more > if it continues to work well and do the job it was intended to do? >
Well, if you're in the same position I am, I want the K10D because of many new things that it offers (note: speculated features), improved image quality, shake reduction, future support for USM lenses, sealed body, faster, bigger buffer, better dynamic range, 10Mp, etc. So, should I keep my *istD if I'm not made of money? Probably not, so I sold mine, to help me finance the new one. Sure the *istD still takes great pictures, but the K10D is more along the lines of what I would like as a tool right now. > Godfrey > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
