David Savage wrote: > At 10:18 AM 12/09/2006, Adam Maas wrote: > >> Digital Image Studio wrote: >> >> http://www.digitimes.com/Backgrounders/ArtReview.asp?datePublish=2006/09/11&pages=PR&seq=204&Cat=1 >> >>> http://tinyurl.com/puph6 >>> >>> >From a dpreview post >>> >>> >> And apart from some pictures, what has that to do with the viability of >> CF? These devices will work just fine in SD cards too. >> >> -Adam >> > > Check the capacities they're talking about Adam. > > 64GB is pretty impressive. Considering the audio & video applications, CF > isn't a dead format. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > > Doesn't CF use a modified IDE interface? That might be a large part of why its still around.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
