Rumours and/or documents being circulated under the table. I know you love rumours Shel ;-)
Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff Sent: 12. september 2006 18:43 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: Weather-sealed body Y'gotta start somewhere. You've won the prize for being the first person to complain about the new camera. I wondered how long it would take before complaints and criticisms started. What makes you think the upcoming 16-50/2.8 will have a "super-sonic motor" - I don't recall seeing that announced anywhere? Shel > [Original Message] > From: Mike Hamilton > What is the purpose of a weather sealed body without any sealed > lenses? I imagine that the two upcoming lenses (16-50/2.8 being one) > will be weather sealed. If so, that's going to be an expensive lens, > given the super-sonic motor and fast aperture... Perhaps Pentax's > most expensive zoom? Pentax has typically produced high priced primes > (A* and FA*, FA Limiteds), but not really the expensive zooms (barr > the 24-90 and a couple of FA* zooms). > > Is my reasoning correct? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
