Just for the record the D isn't much different size than the Ds/Dl/2
body cameras. The actually looks smaller when they are near each other
due to the different shapes of the prism/RTF housing, until you look
closer, and you realize they just have slightly different shapes.
David Savage wrote:
>At 10:35 PM 13/09/2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
>
>>Or, another way of looking at it might be to consider how much smaller the
>>D would be
>>if it used an SD card.
>>
>>
>
>
>You've seen and handled both the D & DS, how much different are they WRT size?
>
>Of the *ist range the only other one I've handled is the DL & I didn't
>think it was that much smaller.
>
>IMO the only dimension of the camera in which you save space in replacing
>CF with SD is in it's depth, as the camera can't get much smaller height
>wise. In any case were only talking about an extra 3-4mm (~1/8")
>
>Dave
>
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
