That appears to be VERY preproduction firmware. Just look at the obvious interference noise in the ISO 800 sample, and the Focal Length field in EXIF (which obviously has the values backwards, that's likely a 14mm DA)
-Adam Christian wrote: > David Savage wrote: > >>One each at ISO 100 & 800 >> >><http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=20043414> >> >>Add a "h" to the start of the URL. >> >>Warning not dial up friendly, one file is ~4M & the other is ~6M. >> >>I suspect this is the reason why the Pentax reps don't want people >>taking pictures with the pre-production models. >> >>Dave >> > > > yeah, the noise at 800 is awful. > Direct links including EXIF: > > http://uploader.fam.cx/data/21166.jpg > Camera Make: PENTAX Corporation > Camera Model: PENTAX K10D > Image Date: 2006:08:31 19:41:45 > Flash Used: No > Focal Length: 21.3mm (35mm equivalent: 14mm) > Exposure Time: 0.022 s (1/45) > Aperture: f/3.5 > ISO equiv: 100 > White Balance: Auto > Metering Mode: Matrix > Exposure: program (Auto) > > http://uploader.fam.cx/data/21167.jpg > Camera Make: PENTAX Corporation > Camera Model: PENTAX K10D > Image Date: 2006:08:31 20:24:01 > Flash Used: No > Focal Length: 21.3mm (35mm equivalent: 14mm) > Exposure Time: 0.050 s (1/20) > Aperture: f/3.2 > ISO equiv: 800 > White Balance: Auto > Metering Mode: Matrix > Exposure: program (Auto) > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
