Half a stop underexposure and any camera will be noisy at 800. These are useless examples. On Sep 15, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Christian wrote:
> David Savage wrote: >> One each at ISO 100 & 800 >> >> <http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp? >> forum=1036&message=20043414> >> >> Add a "h" to the start of the URL. >> >> Warning not dial up friendly, one file is ~4M & the other is ~6M. >> >> I suspect this is the reason why the Pentax reps don't want people >> taking pictures with the pre-production models. >> >> Dave >> > > yeah, the noise at 800 is awful. > Direct links including EXIF: > > http://uploader.fam.cx/data/21166.jpg > Camera Make: PENTAX Corporation > Camera Model: PENTAX K10D > Image Date: 2006:08:31 19:41:45 > Flash Used: No > Focal Length: 21.3mm (35mm equivalent: 14mm) > Exposure Time: 0.022 s (1/45) > Aperture: f/3.5 > ISO equiv: 100 > White Balance: Auto > Metering Mode: Matrix > Exposure: program (Auto) > > http://uploader.fam.cx/data/21167.jpg > Camera Make: PENTAX Corporation > Camera Model: PENTAX K10D > Image Date: 2006:08:31 20:24:01 > Flash Used: No > Focal Length: 21.3mm (35mm equivalent: 14mm) > Exposure Time: 0.050 s (1/20) > Aperture: f/3.2 > ISO equiv: 800 > White Balance: Auto > Metering Mode: Matrix > Exposure: program (Auto) > > > > > -- > > Christian > http://photography.skofteland.net > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
