It's simple, Tom. The *ist cameras were very good. This camera appears to be better. Why is that hard to understand? On Sep 15, 2006, at 5:30 PM, Tom C wrote:
> My point is largely this: > > I am amazed by the strenuous defense of Pentax (by some) when 6MP > is all > they had to offer, juxtaposed by the instant desire to abandon 6MP > when > Pentax has better. > > I understand the 2nd part, but not the first. > > > Tom C. > > > >> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:25:05 -0400 >> >> Dig away. >> On Sep 15, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Tom C wrote: >> >>> >>> Why was I riduculed then? You want me to dig them out? >>> >>> >>> Tom C. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >>>> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:44:44 -0400 >>>> >>>> That's the biggest crock of BS I've ever seen on the list. We've >>>> all >>>> been clamoring for a higher resolution camera for a long time. I >>>> would say it's unanimous. On the other hand, many of us did >>>> point out >>>> that the 6 MP cameras worked very well. There's a difference >>>> that you >>>> apparently don't understand. >>>> Paul >>>> On Sep 15, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Tom C wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've got emails saved from 3 months back when a lot of you guys >>>>> were >>>>> ridiculing me for wanting more than a 6MP DSLR and saying I >>>>> thought >>>>> it was >>>>> foolish for Pentax to continue making them, and how you were >>>>> TOTALLY HAPPY >>>>> and SATISFIED with your 6MP Pentax. Now your all in line to buy a >>>>> new one! >>>>> >>>>> *IF* Pentax Japan actually listens to this list and takes >>>>> seriously >>>>> the >>>>> views expressed here (which I highly doubt), then you actually owe >>>>> all the >>>>> 'negative', 'whining', ' Chicken Little's' on this list a 'Thank >>>>> you' for >>>>> theor voice, because otherwise you'd convince Pentax to kep on >>>>> churning out >>>>> more of the same. >>>>> >>>>> Now, that's a hoot. >>>>> >>>>> Tom C. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>>>>> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >>>>>> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:05:46 -0400 >>>>>> >>>>>> Rob, you're a hoot. First you complain that the Pentax offerings >>>>>> aren't good enough. Now, you're complaining that they're too >>>>>> good. >>>>>> HAR! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 15/09/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sheesh, for now take some pleasure and pride in what Pentax is >>>>>>>> trying to do >>>>>>>> here, that the camera is ore a leader than anything Pentax has >>>>>>>> produced in >>>>>>>> a long time, accept that the company may never really compete >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> Canon in >>>>>>>> terms of numbers, enjoy the concept of forwards and backwards >>>>>>>> lens >>>>>>>> compatibility, check out the camera when it arrives in your >>>>>>>> area, and >>>>>>>> decide if it's worthwhile for you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's the likely excessive demand that they are creating that >>>>>>> has me >>>>>>> worried, the price point has got people from all aver the place >>>>>>> interested. The point is that they can't compete with Canon >>>>>>> numbers, >>>>>>> we all know this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Rob Studdert >>>>>>> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA >>>>>>> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 >>>>>>> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours >>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ >>>>>>> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
