I should have proof read that before i sent it. Here it is again in a form
that makes sense :)

I think my method is similar to your new style, only when i have
time though. I like to if possible shoot a lot of shots of the same subject
varying my position and settings, i like to try and explore the subject as
best I can. I think this has improved my amount of keepers and my
understanding of the subjects i'm shooting.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: What's Your Shooting Style?


> I think my method is similar to your new style, although only when i have
> time. I like to if possible should a lot of shots of the same subject
> varying my position and setting, i like to try and explore the subject as
> best I can. I think this has improved my amount of keepers and my
> understanding of the subjects i'm shooting.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Creature's Comfort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:42 AM
> Subject: What's Your Shooting Style?
>
>
> > This may require more than one sentence ...
> >
> > About 18 months ago there was a discussion here about the methods we
> > use to photograph a subject.  At that time I mentioned that I usually
> > have a shot in mind, make the exposure, and then move on.  When
> > working with people I'd shoot more frames, as their movement and
> > expressions can change, and and offer more possibilities.
> >
> > Recently, however, I've found myself shooting many more frames of the
> > same subject.  For example, yesterday I came across a grounded fishing
> > boat, and I shot fifteen frames, varying slightly the perspective, the
> > focus points, the DOF and aperture, moving closer or further from the
> > boat, etc.  Later in the day I shot the remainder of the roll, about
> > 21 frames, of a few people sitting on the beach.  Again I moved
> > around, included more or less background, and so on.  And, still
> > later, with another body and lens, I spent 20+ frames photographing an
> > old shed and some Eucalyptus trees in a foggy valley, again varying
> > position and waiting for the fog to move in ways that would provide a
> > better or more obscured view of the trees.
> >
> > Had I more time (I was with someone) and more film with me, I think
> > I'd have shot at least a roll in each situation.  I'm not sure why my
> > shooting style has changed - perhaps because I've started using a
> > Leica as well as the Pentax, and the shooting style of the rangefinder
> > lends itself to a different way of seeing, or perhaps it's because of
> > a workshop I took in which the instructor suggested getting as many
> > shots as possible of your subject - to shoot for nuances and
> > subtleties as well as gross composition.  Regardless, I feel that I'm
> > getting more "keepers" with this method than before.
> >
> > I just wanted to mention this and, perhaps, some of you may want to
> > comment on your methodology.
> >
> > --
> > Sheldon Belinkoff
> > CREATURE'S COMFORT
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > -
> > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
> >
> >
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to