On 9/19/06 11:39 AM, "Thibouille", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> A Dimage A2, clear? LOL Ken you're funny today ;)

If you read my posts carefully;

1. I am not impressed by the current generation of EVF.  I even said that it
cannot replace the optical viewfinder.  I know all these :-).

2. I was consistently talking about "what if" scenario in response to
Godfrey's remark "Nice how the lack of a reflex mirrorbox thins out the M8".
It was in that context, I reminded myself of predictions by some industry
experts that the properly implemented EVF (i.e., high resolution and fast
refresh rate etc) will change the whole concept of the current DSLR
body/lens design.  I just wanted to be open minded.

3. I said the EVF of the K/M A2 (or whatever it was) changed my perception
of EVF mainly because of higher resolution (but still slow refreshing rate),
so it was just a comparative comment.

I do believe that somebody somewhere should be developing a "superior" EVF.
Perhaps some of those non-traditional camera makers? :-).

TTL viewfinder is the only thing which is dictating the current design and
the form factor of SLRs, and I believe someone will break this mould in
order to get ahead of competitions.
For example, one of the powerful camera makers have notorious viewfinder,
designed mainly for the AF (on their entry to mid level), but well designed
EVF in the future will enable MF on these cameras :-).

So much on this.

Ken


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to