On 9/19/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott Loveless wrote: > > On 9/17/06, Mat Maessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>On 9/17/06, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>>I was winging the settings as there isnt one on the 220 for > >>>transparancies. > >> > >>Not related to your question, but how do you like the 220 for > >>general-purpose photo printing? I'm thinking I need to kick my 820 to > >>the curb... > >> > > > > I have the 320, Mat. Very similar to the 220, same ink. They clog > > all the time. If we don't print about every three days or so, we have > > to clean the nozzles (and dump a cubic butt ton of ink in the > > process). Other than that, I really like the printer. > > > > > Funny, but my 320 just about never clogs and I don't print alot. Great > output on Premium Luster though. The old C86 has some issues though. > Premium Luster is all we use. Christie and I both like it quite a bit. We tried an Ilford paper (I forget which one) which I thought was fine. The wife bought some more Premium Luster when the Ilford ran out. :)
-- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com Shoot more film! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
