Apart from having to spot dust specks, I don't mind scanning slides. Scanning negatives is miserable, though.
Rick --- "Ralf R. Radermacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Merely haven't done any colour film scanning since I > got my DS, almost a > year ago. Now, I've had to find I've lost about > three years' worth of > film scans and I'm starting all over again. > > Seems I had almost forgotten what a drag this is. > How can it be that a > 700 euro dedicated film scanner and a computer that > performance-wise > would have been the pride and joy of every met > service, just a few years > ago, aren't able to produce a remotely correct > colour balance while > every cheapo digicam can? > > Still have to see the first colour picture from my > DS come out only half > (make that a tenth, actually) as bad as what I'm > getting from a > computer/scanner system that has cost several times > the price of the DS. > > Ralf > > *) Minolta 5400 > **) Mac Dual G5 > > -- > Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, > Germany > private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de > manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. > 10, 2005 > Contarex - Kiev 60 - Horizon 202 - P6 mount lenses > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
