That's my hope. And at least at f1.4, maybe even a 1.2. -Adam
John Forbes wrote: > It is interesting that the 200 and 300 lenses are D FA, not DA. Pity no > apertures are noted for the later lenses. The 55mm harks back to Takumar > days, and might perhaps become a portrait lens to rival the 85mm lenses. > > John > > On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 05:56:15 +0100, Digital Image Studio > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 21/09/06, Douglas Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Here is the 2007 lens roadmap in English: >>> http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/en/lens/roadmap.pdf >>> >>> Aside from the three DA* zooms, I don't see anything >>> particularly exciting. >> So we will have a 40, 43, 50, 55, where the hell is the 60mm? >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
