>I just had a discussion with pro(?). :) He told me that Fuji NPH is
>hard-to-use film for wedding, especially for the beginner. I was and I am
>going to use this film mainly (+some bw, most believable TMax), and I'd
>like to get your opinion - has anyone of you found Fuji NPH to be a
>hard-to-use film? That guy claimed smth about narrow latitude, low
>contrast, bigger grain if compared to Fuji Press 400, oh, don't remember
>other stuff :) So, the question is - is it true or not?
I tried NPH once but was disappointed by its result. With the same lab,
Reala turned out great. So I guess Reala is a more user friendly film. But
then it's a ISO100 film. Another option is NHG II 800 (but I have yet to try
one).
>P.S. BTW: my food now is fresh air and water, but I got METZ 54MZ-3
>flash... It's really good, but it has 2 drawbacks: it doesn't work with
>ZX-M (camera does not receive FashReady signal) and flash/SCA adapter
>connection is a bit loose, otherwise it performs excellent. I'd probably
>went for 500FTZ but local "dealer" hadn't any in stock and promised to
>deliver one after 2 months. That was too long to wait.
I have the 40MZ3i which is a bit loose on SCA372 adaptor, but very firm with
the SCA3701 adaptor.
regards,
Alan Chan
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
