----- Original Message ----- From: "Boris Liberman" Subject: Re: DA 18-55
> I've found that on digital the FAJ 18-35 is not bad at all, if not > very good. Also, at least to my taste the difference between 18 mm and > 20 mm on wide is meaningful. So, at least I would suggest to try the > FAJ 18-35 option as well. > > I've 2/3 through the test film which I shot with FAJ 18-35 past > weekend... I'll be sure to report my findings when I finish the roll > and have it processed. I was pleasantly surprised by the 18-35. It's a pretty decent little optic within it's own limitation of being a bit on the slow side. I tried it on film, and I recall it would cover the full frame, albeit with softness at the edges. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
