If you look at their history you wouldn't be surprised.
Bob Shell wrote:
>On Sep 25, 2006, at 7:33 PM, Russell Kerstetter wrote:
>
>
>
>>I do not mean to imply that .40 is extreme, but this is the same guy
>>that gets angry every time he sees a National Geographic because he is
>>under the impression that NGS gives lot 'o' money towards gun control.
>> I do not know if he is correct or not, but I do not care enough to
>>cancel my free subscription (it was a gift).
>>
>>
>
>Who says National Geographic is for gun control!!?? Not so. I've
>worked on six books for them. The first time I went into their
>offices in DC the editor I was working with said to me, "I don't care
>how you feel personally, but inside this building if anyone asks,
>you're a Republican." I'm glad he warned me. It's a Republican
>stronghold there. Charlton Heston would be right at home.
>
>Bob
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
