Bob W wrote: >>> Well, it was founded by rich businessmen, so in the >>> past it wouldn't have been surprising. (Or do you mean >>> something else?) >>> >>> I'm more surprised that it's apparently still the case >>> today. A lot of conservative Republicans wouldn't like >>> some of the stuff published in National Geographic's >>> publications...
>> I was surprised. Most of the writers and photographers I know who >> work for them are pretty liberal, but then most of the writers and >> photographers I know who don't work for them are also pretty >> liberal. Maybe they can't find conservative Republican writers and >> photographers. > "Why is it always the intelligent people who are socialists?" - Alan > Bennett > > Bob Actually, it isn't, is it. The Socialists tend to be those who remain immersed in or at least associated with one or more Universities for a large part of their lives. Why IS that? (That's a rhetorical question...) Suppose they can't make it on their own, without the crutch of claiming membership in some ivy-covered institution of learning? I know those were not YOUR words, Bob, but even as a signature, I can't help commenting on them. keith whaley -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
