Non-alakaline AA"s are the lowest common denominators. I've even used those in a pinch. :-)
Tom C. >From: "K.Takeshita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Interview w/Pentax exec >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:15:58 -0400 > >On 9/28/06 7:46 PM, "William Robb", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > suspect that the lowest common denominator of > > consumer intelligence factored into it, > >Exactly. > > > though it was mentioned onlist > > that they needed more voltage(?) than could be supplied by 4 AA > > batteries or some such. > >Not necessarily the more voltage but the stability of it (perhaps under >load). Another reason was Alkaline batts (yes, the lowest common >denominator some innocent customers might use) have wide varieties of >performance difference between manufacturers. > >Ken > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
