It's small, light and decent. But not up to the quality of Nikon's 70-200VR and 28-70 AF-S or 17-55 AF-S.
Ken's an idiot, but we all know that already. But he has shot with it (And used it in his 50mm comparison, which included test shots). -Adam Rick Womer wrote: > I wonder if Kenny-boy has bothered to shoot with it > before recommending it. If he shot with it, I wonder > if he bothered to look at the pix. > > Cynical me. > > Rick > > --- Amita Guha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> ...Ken Rockwell claims it's replaced most of the >> lenses in his bag, including primes. > > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
