K10D viewfinder IS beter than the one of the D IMO.
Check before stating things. I did.

2006/9/30, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mat Maessen wrote:
> > On 9/29/06, Juan Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Of course, I suggested he goes with the K10D, saying that its specs
> >> are closer to a D200 than to a D80. He's leaning towards it, but says
> >> that he likes that Nikon has an 18-135 lens--he doesn't want to carry
> >> any extra lenses (!).
> >
> > Is it just me, or does it seem like a bad idea to make a decision on a
> > camera system based on a single consumer-zoom lens? I'd debate the
> > wisdom of the 18-125 vs. a pair of zooms, in the 18-55 and the 50-200,
> > even if he ends up going with the Nikon equivalents (not sure what
> > Nikon has in those focal lengths).
> >
> > The viewfinder on the D80 would probably still keep me out of the
> > system, though I have a friend who is very happy with his D200.
> >
> > -Mat
> >
>
> The viewfinder on the D80 is as good or better than a D or DS. I don't
> see the K10D having a better viewfinder.
>
> Nikon's kit zooms are the 18-55DX and 55-200DX. Decent lenses, but not
> up to the Pentax DA's (The Nikon 55-200 is probably optically as good as
> the 50-200, but the build quality is distinctly worse).
>
> _Adam
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 

Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
----------------------
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to