It's interesting but you get both views from various reviews. I've seen
reviews that will flat out say that the Pentax D series cameras have
lower noise characteristics than Canons and others that talk about how
noisy Pentax DSLR are at high ISO. The only Canons I've seen high ISO
output from were D20s and my brother's digital Rebel, (don't even ask).
The D20 output is extremely clean but don't seem noticably cleaner than
my D and DS at any particular ISO. I don't think my brother has
actually taken his DigiReb, beyond ISO 100 and uses the built in flash
for most inside shots, and to think he never even had a flash for his
Minolta SRT 101.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>So, how well does Canon do at higher ISO setting? Do they equal or exceed
>what we've seen thus far from Pentax?
>
>Shel
>
>
>
>
>
>>[Original Message]
>>From: Christian
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Is CMOS supposedly better than what
>>>we have now, and, if so, in what
>>>way(s). If it is better, then why aren't
>>>other camera manufacturers using
>>>such sensors?
>>>
>>>
>>The lack of noise at high sensitivity is something people claim as an
>>advantage for CMOS. Supposedly a drawback is that they suck more power.
>>
>>Any truth in there? Maybe, but I bet you get an argument on both.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
