Yes, I fiddled with them for quite a while. There's just not much in the scan. I had to push them hard to get rid of an overall muddiness. I might be able to tweak the scan adjustments and get something better, but it may just be due to the limited range of the flatbed. Paul On Oct 3, 2006, at 6:39 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> > Paul wrote: >> >>> I did as I had threatened, and shot a couple of rolls of Portra >> VC 160 >>> at the local Farmer's Market. I used the 6x7 with the 165/4 Leaf >>> Shutter lens and the AF 400T flash with a Lumiquest Softbox. I >> like the >>> fill from the softbox, particularly in the shot of the kids >> sitting on >>> the wall with the hard midday crosslight. Nothing special here, >> but I >>> had a good time, and I like the performance of that lens. The >> negs look >>> great under a loupe. If I were to continue with medium format, I >> would >>> want a better film scanner. I'm still using the Epson Photo 3200 >>> flatbed. It's marginal. >> >>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5027776&size=lg >>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5027772 >>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5027701&size=lg > > Hmm. Sorry Paul, but these all look overly bright and too flat on my > screen. There seems little depth/dimensionality to them. I'm sure > it's simply rendering issues. > > Godfrey > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
