It IS moving to the future. A future without aperture simulators. I don't know, nor do I care, about the whys and wherefores, but it IS the future for Pentax and you can accept it or move on.
Dude, I made my feelings clear when I didn't see an upgrade to the *ist D in the works almost 2 years ago and switched brands. Why don't you make your feelings clear and dump Pentax and switch to Canon as you keep threatening. Oh, I know why you're bitter now. Your K/M lenses aren't worth shit because of the green-button-no-aperture-simulator thing. You're just pissed because you won't make money off your old lenses.... (for the record, the K10D is the camera I was waiting for; too late; too bad) -- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net J. C. O'Connell wrote: > YOUR CRAZY. Deciding to abandon perfectly good working > Products in the field for no valid reason ( cost or > Technical issues ) is not "Moving to the future". > Unless you consider the "future" a bad place where > Everything gets worse instead of better. Supporting > K/M isnt holding them back from anything in the DSLRs. > Its NOT abandonment in the name of progress, its just > Abandonment period which is a BIG difference. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Christian > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 4:02 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: The JCO survey > > And WHERE in ANY of my posts did I say it was left out for "cost or > technical" reasons? I only said that Pentax is moving to the future. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
