Crikey, dont start them on this one, we have already had vinyl/CD and
cinema film/digital - lets not do video/DVD/film too!
-----Original Message-----
From: Skofteland, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2001 17:12
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Slides vs. digital
It doesn't mean I have to like it....
I will be the last holdout, many, many, years from now with my manual
focus
LX and slide film while EVERYONE around me is shooting digital....
My original point was that digital photography is not and never will be
a
REPLACEMENT for film. It is just another medium as videotape is to
motion
picture film. I think this statement gives a better sense of what I was
trying to say before.
And before any one argues the whole videotape vs. film issue let me say
that
video has replaced film in consumer markets but not in the motion
picture
and documentary industry.
Christian Skofteland
System Administrator
ServerVault Inc.
"Securing the Internet"
(703)652-5971 (Direct)
(703)333-5900 (Main)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Slides vs digital
Even if the digital images are transferred to film, if the resulting
color
saturation and contrast looks like film, then the digital image must
have
been that good in the first place for film to capture it.
Furthermore, all-digital projection *is* coming. The most recent Star
Wars
movie was shot directly onto computer, then edited and assembled and put
onto film for distribution. But a few places (with high-dollar
equipment)
displayed it digitally, so what the viewers saw at the theatre were
images
that had never been on film at all anywhere in the process.
There's a lot more of this kind of thing coming...
-- Original Message --
>I believe even THAT digital wizardry is put on film before we watch it
at
>the theater....
>
>Christian Skofteland
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lewis, Gerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:30 AM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: Slides vs digital
>
>
>Think of this next time you see one of those high tech computer
generated
>digital movie spectaculars. I think they qualify as having high
quality
>color saturation and contrast. That capability is certainly there for
>digital, it is only a matter of time before it comes down to the
consumer
>level.
>
>Jerry in Houston
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:02 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Slides vs digital
>
>>
>> There is no substitution for the color saturation and contrast of
high
>> quality color transparency film.
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
